Author Topic: what happend to p11jon  (Read 23079 times)

Offline Toby

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,904
  • Car - less
Re: what happend to p11jon
« Reply #60 on: 10 May 2012, 13:31 »
its sad... the audi s4 bi turbo engine blows all std golfs away. and that's well old!

This!  Propper naughty!

Well my mk4 is getting sold n aldi to replace!

A real 304bhp 286lbft in a mk4 golf!

Currently down under

Offline Jay

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,421
  • balding fat cvnt
Re: what happend to p11jon
« Reply #61 on: 10 May 2012, 13:50 »

It's like you love the r32, I hate it

R32 is outdated & unefficient  :cool:
Who cares if it's inefficient, it goes a hell of a lot better than most cars and sounds awesome  :cool:
Passat B5.5 2.3 V5 170, with all the extras.

Want some online storage? Click here to sign up for a Dropbox account.

But for the purest engine experience, displacement has no replacement. All other methods are simply attempts to artificially recreate the benefits of displacement.

Offline F17BAD

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 4,226
  • Golf MTM S3 GTI TURBO
Re: what happend to p11jon
« Reply #62 on: 10 May 2012, 14:27 »
R32's are just too slow for what they are, and use too much fuel
Mk4 version was the best, infact id call it a classic already but unfortunately it's awesome looks have been tarnished by all the chav look a likes

All just my opinions of course
  


Not no ordinary GTI....

House classics and Techno mixes:
https://soundcloud.com/bradkells
www.mixcloud.com/kells/

Offline R32UK

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,693
Re: what happend to p11jon
« Reply #63 on: 10 May 2012, 15:46 »
R32's are just too slow for what they are, and use too much fuel
Mk4 version was the best, infact id call it a classic already but unfortunately it's awesome looks have been tarnished by all the chav look a likes

All just my opinions of course

I find its a shame that the main factor in which car/engine is better boils down to cost. Lets take cost out of the equation and the R32 mk5 is still the quickest/best sounding/best handling golf out there (excluding the .:R).

Im not even going to entertain a conversation about the golf 4 being better than the 5 as the majority of people on this forum are stuck in a time warp. The 4 is so far behind the 5 its not even funny. I think the fact that mk3 owners chose to pick on mk4 owners says it all really.  :lipsrsealed:

Offline Kerrse

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: what happend to p11jon
« Reply #64 on: 10 May 2012, 15:49 »

It's like you love the r32, I hate it

R32 is outdated & inefficient  :cool:
Who cares if it's inefficient, it goes a hell of a lot better than most cars and sounds awesome  :cool:


Most people care nowadays, personally would rather have turbo charged engine any day that a fuel guzzling 3.2  :cool:

Offline R32UK

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,693
Re: what happend to p11jon
« Reply #65 on: 10 May 2012, 16:03 »

It's like you love the r32, I hate it

R32 is outdated & inefficient  :cool:
Who cares if it's inefficient, it goes a hell of a lot better than most cars and sounds awesome  :cool:


Most people care nowadays, personally would rather have turbo charged engine any day that a fuel guzzling 3.2  :cool:

the 3.2 v6 is really no more or less efficient than most 3.2 v6's. the fact that most people that run a golf cannot afford to run a R32 probably is.

Offline Kerrse

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: what happend to p11jon
« Reply #66 on: 10 May 2012, 16:12 »

the 3.2 v6 is really no more or less efficient than most 3.2 v6's. the fact that most people that run a golf cannot afford to run a R32 probably is.

Could afford to run one with ease just think turbo engines do the same job but cost a lot less to run with a lot lower emissions & in this day & age that is important i think, no matter if you can afford it or not  :cool:

hence why i have a diesel turbo although was tempted by the R  :evil:

Offline R32UK

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,693
Re: what happend to p11jon
« Reply #67 on: 10 May 2012, 17:58 »

the 3.2 v6 is really no more or less efficient than most 3.2 v6's. the fact that most people that run a golf cannot afford to run a R32 probably is.

Could afford to run one with ease just think turbo engines do the same job but cost a lot less to run with a lot lower emissions & in this day & age that is important i think, no matter if you can afford it or not  :cool:

hence why i have a diesel turbo although was tempted by the R  :evil:

by afford I mean, actually afford without thinking about it. If the R cost you exactly the same per month as your current ride, which would you opt for?

I find it a shame that many people will grow up and never realise there is no replacement for displacement  :undecided:

Offline golf-sib

  • I live here
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,683
  • Турботазик
Re: what happend to p11jon
« Reply #68 on: 10 May 2012, 18:42 »
there is no replacement for displacement  :undecided:

There is, its not a VR6, but a chevy V8 7.0  :grin: :grin: :grin:


Audi TT - K04 TFSI Hybrid - 325BHP
VW Golf - k03 AGU - 200BHP

1.8T AGU..
R135
╚╬╬╝
  24


My Chinese Bike project: http://xtrsproject.wordpress.com/

Offline R32UK

  • Forum addict
  • *
  • Posts: 5,693
Re: what happend to p11jon
« Reply #69 on: 10 May 2012, 20:07 »
there is no replacement for displacement  :undecided:

There is, its not a VR6, but a chevy V8 7.0  :grin: :grin: :grin:


too  heavy..  might as well put a mk4 under the hood  :grin: